RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01112
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H, which denotes (Air
National Guard (ANG) pending discharge in accordance with ANGR
39-10 involuntary) be changed to an eligible code.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She received an honorable discharge at separation and has done
nothing wrong; she should not have been given an RE code that
prevents her from reenlisting.
She failed her Career Development Course (CDC) and was not able
to be reclassified into another Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC)
because she was unable to obtain a security clearance. This RE
code is preventing her from reenlisting into another branch of
service. While she was working towards clearing the issues with
her credit, she failed her CDCs.
In support of her appeal, the applicant provides copies of her
Special Order P-003433, dated 28 Jun 01 (Air Force Reserve
separation order); AF Form 2096, Classification/On-the-Job
Training Action and National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report
of Separation and Record of Service, issued in conjunction with
her 1 Dec 10 separation from the ANG.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 15 Sep 06, the applicant enlisted in the New York ANG.
On 1 Dec 10, the applicant was honorably discharged by reason of
substandard/unsatisfactory performancejob skill proficiency,
and was issued an RE code of 6H. She was credited with 4 years,
2 months, and 17 days of service for pay.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PS recommends denial, stating, in part, that NGB/A1PP, the
Subject Matter Expert (SME), recommends the applicant's RE code
remain unchanged. If the applicant wishes to enlist in another
branch of service she can contact a recruiter and request a
waiver to allow her to become eligible for enlistment. Having
complied with the BCMR directive and the governing directive
there is no evidence to support the applicants claim.
The complete A1PS evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 22 Mar 13 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation
of the National Guard Bureau office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find
no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-01112 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 14, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 18 Mar 13, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Mar 13.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01911
At the time she was discharged she had no idea that she was permanently disqualified from reentering a military service. The medical discharge is a false representation of her service in the Air National Guard (ANG). The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 20 Dec 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01432
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01432 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 6H (Pending Discharge-Involuntary) on his National Guard Bureau Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, be upgraded so he may reenter the Air National Guard (ANG). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00592
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 6H (Pending Discharge - Involuntary) be corrected. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant's military personnel records, he initially entered the Air National Guard on 4 Aug 11. Therefore, we recommend the applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00803
The complete A1P evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANTS REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He was denied promotion because the MS ANG reneged on his assignment orders without advising him just weeks after arriving on station. The resource to promote him to the grade of SMSgt as reflected on his orders was taken away when another member was placed in his position. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 6H, which denotes Pending Discharge in accordance with ANGR 39-10 Involuntary (ANG Only), be removed from his records. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01507
On 31 July 2007, the commander notified the member that he was being discharged from the ANG under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, Substandard (Unsatisfactory) Performance. On 31 July 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged from the MI ANG because he failed his end-of-course examination for his CDC twice. ___________________________________________________________ _____ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00685
On 3 Aug 10, the Vice Chief of Joint Staff signed an order amending the applicants separation from the ANG and transfer to the Air Force Reserve to reflect his discharge from the WYANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force effective 10 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 2.25.2, ANG Unique Separations. In addition, no one had the authority to discharge the applicant from the Reserve of the Air Force (See SAF/IG Report at Exhibit B). According to AFI 36-3209, the authority to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02149
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record should be changed because it was created through an administrative error by the finance office and through no fault of her own. The Air Force Financial Services Center Debts and Remissions Branch directed the collection rate of $350.00 per month for seven months until the member's current expired term of service (ETS) date of 20 Nov 2012. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00787 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 11 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from her records. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00787
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00787 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Referral Officer Performance Report (OPR) dated 11 Oct 12, be declared void and removed from her records. The complete A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...